top of page

LASER Consortium

IMG_8841_edited.jpg

We are an EDCTP funded project assessing the impact of long acting spatial emanators (LASER) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) in Kenya to better inform policy on malaria control in high transmission settings.

Project Background

Spatial emanators represent a promising new tool in malaria prevention. Following successful trials in western Kenya that demonstrated a significant reduction in malaria infections following the introduction of the short acting spatial emanators (Mosquito Shield™), the WHO issued a conditional recommendation for spatial emanators in August 2025. The long-acting Guardian™ product, which protects for up to 12 months, offers a simplified deployment approach compared to short-acting alternatives.

 

To guide policy decisions on optimal vector control strategies, evidence is urgently needed to fill specific knowledge gaps, in order to achieve the greatest reduction in malaria burden with available resources. Key evidence needs include: (i) a better understanding of the efficacy of LASER on epidemiological and entomological endpoints, (ii) the mechanisms of action of SRs and how these are affected by insecticide resistance, (iii) optimal tools to evaluate volatile insecticides and LASERs, and (iv) further evidence on effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and willingness-to-pay for LASERs.
 

Our goal is to assess both the epidemiological impact of the novel LASER technology and, through an inter-disciplinary approach, address the key issues that will impact the uptake and long-term sustainability of this novel control method.

DSC_0262.JPG
WhatsApp Image 2025-09-30 at 12.33.44.jpeg
a69590e8-ddff-420c-9ff0-fa6cfb18fb5b.jpg

Study Overiew

Primary Research Questions

  1. Are long-acting spatial emanators/repellents (LASER) more effective than standard care for malaria control in western Kenya?

  2. How does protection compare to Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) with pirimiphos-methyl?

Design

  • Cluster-randomized trial involving 69 villages in Western Kenya, with 23 villages assigned to each of three study arms. 

  • 5 cross sectional surveys:

    • Baseline (prior to intervention deployment)

    • Year 1: 6 and 12 months post intervention deployment

    • Year 2: 6 and 12 months post intervention deployment

Duration

2-year study period with interventions delivered annually in January 2026 and January 2027

Interventions

WhatsApp Image 2025-09-30 at 12.32.04.jpeg

LASER + SoC

DSC_0278.JPG

IRS + SoC

d242b7e8-a288-4f2e-8acf-a2c8cf5d7eb1.jpg

SoC (LLINs + IPTp)

 SC Johnson Guardian™ spatial emanators (3-4 devices per structure) plus standard of care

Indoor residual spraying with Actellic 300CS (pirimiphos-methyl) plus standard of care

Ministry of Health long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), vaccines, and intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp)

45920583-06e9-45b7-a33f-3a7350c79924.jpg
WhatsApp Image 2023-02-08 at 23.02.23.jpeg
index.jpeg

Study Objectives

Primary Objective

Evaluate the impact of LASER and IRS compared to standard care on malaria parasite prevalence in children aged 1-15 years (PfPR₁₋₁₅) measured by microscopy in western Kenya

 

Secondary Objectives

Epidemiology:

  • Compare LASER and IRS vs standard care on malaria incidence 

  • Assess whether LASER is non-inferior to IRS (7% point margin)

Entomology:

  • Measure impact on vector density, sporozoite rate and insecticide resistance

  • Characterize mosquito behavior and LASER's mode of action

  • Inform optimal deployment strategies

Qualitative & Economic:

  • Examine community perceptions and delivery barriers

  • Estimate willingness-to-pay and cost-effectiveness

9644272f-8f28-48d6-9a68-669ebf71b172.jpg
9644272f-8f28-48d6-9a68-669ebf71b172.jpg
WhatsApp Image 2025-09-30 at 12.32.37.jpeg
956b0209-55a5-4188-97e8-32da06b7d01b.jpg

Why This
Study
Matters

The 12-month lifespan of Guardian™ positions LASER as a "long-acting, always-on" tool comparable to IRS but potentially more cost-effective and logistically simpler. With IRS facing implementation challenges due to cost and complexity, and uncertain future funding, this trial will provide critical comparative evidence to help national malaria control programs, policymakers, and funders determine the most cost-effective approach to malaria reduction in high-transmission settings.

Consortium overview

​​

Who we are

The LASER consortium unites leading experts in malaria control from Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Radboud University, Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM), and Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Our multidisciplinary team combines deep expertise in epidemiology, entomology, vector biology, anthropology, economics, and public health implementation.

Our Approach

Built on long-standing institutional partnerships, we integrate rigorous scientific research with real-world implementation insights. Our established connections with national and global policymakers ensure that research findings translate into effective malaria control programs and policies.

Our Expertise

We specialize in designing and executing large-scale vector control trials, with proven experience in evaluating novel vector control tools, insecticide resistance monitoring, cost-effectiveness analysis and medical anthropology. Members of the consortium have successfully delivered major trials including LLINEUP (Uganda), ATSB (Kenya), and the Busia SR trial (Kenya).

Our Commitment

We're dedicated to advancing vector control technology from research to market access, working closely with communities, stakeholders, and product developers to deliver evidence-based solutions for malaria prevention.

Work Packages

Blogs, Events & Publications

Contact Us

image_edited.jpg
image_edited.jpg
image_edited.jpg
image_edited.png
image_edited.png

 

© 2025 LASER Consortium. Powered and secured by Wix 

 

bottom of page